We subscribe to the
It's a matter of ethics that only makes sense in the world of managed care health coverage.
A patient has a disease that has a four options for treatment.
Three of the options are covered by their insurance. One is not. Does the doctor discuss all four options with the patient?
When faced with telling patients about a procedure that health insurance doesn't cover, nearly a third of today's doctors will not discuss the options that insurance will not cover.
Many say they feel that if they disclose a procedure that isn't paid for by insurance the patient might ask them to provide the procedure anyway and bill the insurance company for something that is covered.
Doctors feel uncomfortable with the ethics of deceiving the third party provider.
Think about that... withholding information from a patient is ethically preferable to deceiving an insurance company.
In what may be a growing trend, nearly one-third of physicians say they sometimes refrain from offering patients useful medical services that arent covered by their health plans, according to a study published today in the journal Health Affairs.
The finding raises the question of whether physicians are voluntarily censoring themselves to avoid being squeezed between patients needs or preferences for certain services and health plans refusal to pay for those services.
Thirty-one percent of the more than 700 physicians surveyed in the study said that they dont discuss useful treatments with some patients because of health plans coverage restrictions. Among those physicians, 35 percent reported using this tactic more frequently during the past five years. Only 42 percent of physicians surveyed said that they never withhold medical care options from patients because of coverage restrictions.
Most medical codes of ethics strongly discourage physicians from holding back information on useful care from their patients because of coverage rules.
Sadly, significant numbers of physicians are withholding information from some patients as a way of dealing with restrictive coverage rules, said lead study author Matthew K. Wynia, director of the Institute for Ethics at the American Medical Association (AMA) in Chicago. As a result, patients arent getting the whole story. This is especially troubling in a time when we are encouraging patients to participate more actively in their own health care decisions.
Wynia adds that failing to address uncovered services also denies patients the opportunity to argue to change inappropriate coverage restrictions, and "may lead to an erosion of trust in physicians."
Wynia and his colleagues offered several possible explanations for this trend:
" Some physicians said they felt uncomfortable in the past when patients asked them to deceive third-payer payers to obtain uncovered services. Most physicians believe that gaming the system for patients is unethical, and may elect not to offer useful but uncovered services in the hope of avoiding these tense situations, the study authors write.
" Physicians who cared for larger volumes of Medicaid patients were more likely to sometimes withhold information on useful but uncovered treatments. This rationale, while reflecting sympathy for poor patients who cant afford to pay for care on their own, is also paternalist and sometimes incorrect, the study authors note. They also said this attitude may contribute to racial disparities in health care, since African Americans are much more likely than whites to be covered by Medicaid.
" Financial pressures also appear to play a role. Physicians whose incomes depended to a large extent on risk-sharing arrangements with managed care plans for patient care costs tended to say they did not offer some patients useful but uncovered services.
The researchers note that in the late 1990s some managed care plans inserted gag clauses in their contracts with physicians that discouraged or prevented them from discussing uncovered services with patients. That practice was largely dropped amid strong protests by patients and physicians, which led to moves by many states to ban gag clauses.
It is a disturbing irony that some physicians are now effectively gagging themselves in response to coverage restrictions," Wynia said.
Wynia coauthored the study with Jonathan B. VanGeest, of the AMAs Medicine and Public Health Unit and its Program on Health Disparities; Deborah S. Cummins, of the National Patient Safety Foundation, Chicago; and Ira B. Wilson, of Tufts-New England Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston.
Health Affairs, published by Project HOPE, is a bimonthly multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing the leading edge in health policy thought and research.
Source: Health Affairs Press Release
Elsewhere on the Web:
Insurance Company Rewards to Doctors May Not Improve Care
Health Insurance: Understanding What It Covers
July 8 , 2003
Updated June 23, 2006